Lawyer Attorney Firms Specializing in Personal Injury Insurance Claims from the 911 Attacks in New York City USA

1. Motley Rice LLC

  • Expertise and Involvement: Notably proficient in complex litigation, particularly against entities allegedly supporting terrorism. They gained prominence through their groundbreaking work in 9/11 related cases, focusing on the intricate network of financial support for terrorists. Their legal prowess extends to challenging large corporations and institutions, aiming to hold them accountable for unlawful actions.
  • Service Expansion: Motley Rice has diversified its practice to include consumer protection, environmental law, securities litigation, and antitrust cases. They are committed to fighting for justice in public health and corporate accountability, representing clients in opioid litigation, asbestos and mesothelioma cases, and securities fraud. Their approach combines thorough legal research, aggressive litigation strategies, and a deep commitment to client advocacy.

2. Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo P.C.

  • Expertise and Involvement: This firm has a distinguished record in personal injury law, particularly in representing first responders and victims of large-scale disasters. They have dedicated substantial resources to litigating cases involving toxic exposures and catastrophic injuries, with a notable focus on the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks.
  • Service Expansion: Their services have expanded to encompass medical malpractice, motor vehicle accidents, construction accidents, and civil rights violations. They are also involved in litigation related to product liability and premises liability, ensuring that clients receive comprehensive legal support. The firm's commitment to justice is evident in their persistent advocacy for those affected by negligence and malfeasance.

3. Kreindler & Kreindler LLP

  • Expertise and Involvement: A leading authority in aviation law, Kreindler & Kreindler has established a strong reputation for handling complex cases involving airline and aviation industry liabilities. Their expertise is not limited to aviation accidents but also encompasses a broad range of transportation-related legal issues.
  • Service Expansion: The firm has broadened its legal services to include maritime law, product liability, and transportation accidents, covering a wide array of incidents from commercial airline disasters to private aircraft accidents. They offer strategic legal solutions, including litigation and negotiation, to address the multifaceted aspects of transportation and product-related injuries.

4. Barasch McGarry Salzman & Penson

  • Expertise and Involvement: Specializing in personal injury and wrongful death cases, this firm took on the representation of numerous first responders and survivors. They focused on advocating for individuals suffering from various health complications due to exposure to hazardous conditions at the attack sites.
  • Notable Cases: Their legal efforts were crucial in helping many 9/11 heroes receive the necessary medical treatment and compensation for health conditions like respiratory illnesses and cancer.

5. Pitta & Baione LLP

  • Expertise and Involvement: With a particular focus on 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund claims, Pitta & Baione offered their expertise to survivors, responders, and families of the deceased. They provided legal assistance in navigating the complexities of the VCF application process.
  • Notable Cases: The firm?s work included securing compensation for various health conditions, lost wages, and the pain and suffering endured by those affected by the attacks.

6. Weitz & Luxenberg

  • Expertise and Involvement: As a firm with a strong presence in environmental and mass tort litigation, Weitz & Luxenberg became actively involved in representing individuals affected by the toxic exposure at Ground Zero.
  • Notable Cases: Their work in this area included representing clients with respiratory illnesses, cancers, and other health conditions linked to the 9/11 attacks, emphasizing the environmental and health impacts of the disaster.

7. Napoli Shkolnik PLLC

  • Expertise and Involvement: This firm, known for its expertise in complex litigation, particularly in environmental and pharmaceutical litigation, took a significant role in representing 9/11 victims and responders.
  • Notable Cases: Napoli Shkolnik focused on cases related to health issues stemming from the attacks, advocating for the rights and compensation of those who suffered from long-term health effects due to exposure to toxic substances.

Each of these law firms played a crucial role in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Their legal expertise and dedication were essential in addressing the myriad of challenges faced by victims and their families. These firms did not just pursue legal claims; they sought justice and accountability, provided a voice for the voiceless, and worked tirelessly to ensure that those affected by the tragedy received the compensation and support they deserved.


Health Conditions Linked to Personal Injuries from the 9/11 Attacks.


The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and the crash of United Airlines Flight 93, brought about unparalleled destruction and loss of life. Beyond the immediate fatalities, thousands of individuals suffered personal injuries, some of which manifested immediately, while others developed over time due to exposure to hazardous conditions and materials.

1. Immediate Physical Injuries

The cataclysmic events of September 11 inflicted immediate physical injuries on countless individuals. These injuries were as diverse as the individuals affected and ranged from severe burns to bone fractures, deep lacerations, and trauma from being crushed or trapped under the rubble. The victims, many of whom were emergency responders rushing towards the chaos, found themselves in a maelstrom of destruction, facing extreme heat, hazardous airborne particles, and the precariousness of collapsing structures.

In the aftermath, legal avenues were pursued to secure essential aid for the injured. The compensation sought was not merely for the immediate medical treatment but also to cover the long-term financial impacts, such as loss of income and ongoing disability. Those injured grappled with the uncertainty of their future employability, with many unable to resume their previous work due to the lasting effects of their injuries. The legal battles were not just about financial restitution but also recognition of the profound personal toll these injuries took on the victims and their families.

2. Respiratory and Related Conditions

The lingering cloud of toxic dust that enveloped Ground Zero became emblematic of the enduring health crisis faced by many after the attacks. First responders, clean-up crews, and residents in the vicinity were engulfed in a miasma of harmful substances, including asbestos and pulverized building materials, leading to a surge in respiratory illnesses. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, and other severe respiratory conditions emerged, leaving individuals gasping for breath and facing a diminished quality of life.

Legal battles for these sufferers were arduous, as they had to demonstrate a clear causative link between their ailments and the toxic exposure at Ground Zero. These legal struggles often morphed into protracted engagements with insurance entities and compensation boards, necessitating a detailed traversal of complex medical and legal landscapes to secure rightful compensation and acknowledgment of their suffering.

3. Cancers

The tragic aftermath of the 9/11 attacks has unfolded over the years with a noticeable surge in cancer cases among those who were exposed to the toxic milieu at Ground Zero. This increase is not just a statistic but represents a significant health crisis for individuals who inhaled or came into contact with a cocktail of carcinogens released during the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings. The types of cancer linked to this exposure are varied, with lung cancer, mesothelioma, and various blood cancers like leukemia being among the most prevalent. Other rare forms of cancer have also been reported, further complicating the medical and legal landscapes for the victims.

The environment at Ground Zero was laden with asbestos, lead, benzene, and other hazardous substances, all known to have carcinogenic properties. These materials were pulverized into a fine dust that clouded the air and settled over the area, making it almost impossible for those involved in the rescue, recovery, and cleanup operations to avoid exposure. As a result, the individuals who spent time at Ground Zero in the days, weeks, and months following the attacks now face a heightened risk of developing cancer.

Legal challenges in these cancer cases are particularly daunting due to the latency period of many cancers, which can span several years or even decades after exposure before symptoms appear. This delay complicates the process of establishing a direct causal link between the exposure to the toxic substances at Ground Zero and the subsequent development of cancer. Lawyers representing the victims must navigate a maze of medical records, scientific studies, and expert testimonies to draw this connection and prove the case for compensation.

The legal claims surrounding 9/11-related cancer cases are not only about securing financial restitution for the victims but also about recognizing the long-term health consequences of the attacks. These cases highlight the need for ongoing medical monitoring and treatment for those exposed, as well as the establishment of funds to support the affected individuals and their families.

4. Psychological and Emotional Injuries

The psychological and emotional toll of the 9/11 attacks extends far beyond the immediate aftermath, affecting thousands of individuals who experienced the events firsthand, as well as those who lost loved ones or were exposed to the traumatic images and stories. The range of mental health issues stemming from this tragedy is vast, with PTSD, anxiety, depression, and other psychological conditions being prevalent among survivors and those connected to the events.

The intense, life-threatening experiences of that day, the loss of colleagues, friends, and family members, and the ongoing media coverage have left indelible marks on the psyche of many. For some, the sights, sounds, and smells of that day have triggered long-lasting psychological trauma, manifesting in nightmares, flashbacks, severe anxiety, and depression.

Legal claims related to these psychological injuries underscore the complexity of quantifying emotional and mental suffering. They bring to light the necessity for comprehensive mental health care, including therapy, counseling, and psychiatric support, to help individuals cope with the enduring effects of the trauma. These legal actions also emphasize the need for compensation that covers not only immediate therapy but also long-term mental health services.

These legal cases are about more than just financial compensation; they are about recognizing the profound and lasting impact of the 9/11 attacks on the mental health of those affected. They highlight the need for a sustained commitment to mental health support and the acknowledgment of the deep emotional scars left by such a catastrophic event.

5. Musculoskeletal Disorders

In the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, many of the rescue and recovery workers began to experience musculoskeletal disorders, a testament to the physically demanding and hazardous conditions they endured. These disorders encompass a range of conditions, including chronic back pain, joint pain, and repetitive strain injuries, all of which can significantly impair an individual's ability to perform daily activities and maintain employment.

The workers involved in the immediate aftermath faced relentless physical demands, often working long hours in unstable and dangerous environments. They lifted heavy debris, navigated through constricted and treacherous terrain, and engaged in repetitive motions, all of which contributed to the wear and tear on their bodies. Over time, this continuous strain led to the development of chronic musculoskeletal conditions. The severity of these disorders often required ongoing medical treatment, including surgery, physical therapy, and pain management, placing a financial and emotional strain on the affected individuals and their families.

Legal claims for musculoskeletal disorders post-9/11 focused on the need for compensation to cover medical expenses, loss of wages, and other related costs. These claims, however, faced challenges, as proving the direct link between the disorders and the conditions at Ground Zero was complex. The latency of these conditions further complicated matters, with symptoms sometimes taking years to manifest, making it difficult to establish a direct causal relationship. Despite these challenges, the legal efforts aimed to ensure that those who served in the aftermath of the attacks received the necessary support and acknowledgment for their sacrifices and the long-term impact on their health.

6. Hearing and Vision Loss

The immediate explosions and the prolonged, chaotic rescue and recovery operations following the 9/11 attacks resulted in sensory impairments for some individuals, notably in hearing and vision loss. The intense noise from the collapse and subsequent demolition operations led to hearing damage for many first responders and recovery workers. Similarly, the dense smoke, dust, and airborne debris resulted in vision problems for others, ranging from temporary irritation to long-term vision impairment.

Legal claims for these sensory impairments were centered on establishing the direct impact of the 9/11 events. Victims faced the challenge of linking their sensory loss directly to the conditions they were exposed to during and after the attacks. These claims often required detailed medical evidence to demonstrate the extent of the impairment and its direct connection to the exposure at Ground Zero. Compensating for such sensory losses involved not just medical treatment but also specialized equipment and adaptations to assist the affected individuals in their daily lives, highlighting the need for comprehensive support mechanisms.

7. Legal Challenges and Compensation

Navigating the legal landscape for 9/11-related personal injury claims was a monumental challenge. Victims and their families faced numerous obstacles, from proving the direct cause of their conditions to meeting the deadlines set by statutes of limitations. The complexities of the legal system, coupled with the intricacies of the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, made the process daunting and exhausting for many.

The Victim Compensation Fund was established to provide financial relief to those affected by the attacks, but accessing these funds was often a labyrinthine process, requiring extensive documentation and evidence to prove the direct link between the attacks and the injuries or illnesses suffered. This process was not just about securing financial compensation; it was also about obtaining recognition of the suffering and loss endured by the victims and their families.

Legal professionals specializing in 9/11 claims worked tirelessly to navigate these complexities, advocating for fair compensation and guiding claimants through the arduous process. The journey for many was fraught with frustration and sorrow, but it also underscored the resilience of the victims and their persistent quest for justice and recognition. The legal battles fought in the wake of 9/11 are a testament to the enduring spirit of those affected and their unyielding demand for accountability and support.


Types of Legal Claims Arising from the 9/11 Events.


1. Property Damage and Business Interruption Claims

The September 11, 2001 attacks not only left an indelible mark on human lives but also precipitated a complex web of legal and financial challenges, particularly in the realms of property damage and business interruption claims. These claims reflect the profound and multifaceted impact of the events, blending economic loss with the stark reality of the tragedy.

The obliteration of the World Trade Center, a symbol of economic prowess, accounted for a significant portion of the financial devastation, with damage estimates ranging between $10 to $25 billion. This destruction was not just physical but extended to the disruption of businesses, local and global economies, affecting countless entities and individuals. The immediate aftermath saw a surge in insurance claims, as businesses grappled with the loss of infrastructure and the abrupt cessation of their operations.

Navigating these claims was fraught with legal complexities. At the heart of the contention was the debate over whether the two plane crashes constituted a single event or separate incidents for insurance purposes. This distinction was critical, as it significantly influenced the compensation amounts under the terms of insurance policies. The litigation that ensued delved into the nuances of policy language, setting precedents in insurance law under extraordinary circumstances.

The process of filing and resolving these claims was intricate, involving the assessment of direct physical damages and the broader economic impacts of business interruptions. Claimants had to demonstrate the extent of their losses, while insurers had to navigate the delicate balance between contractual obligations and the unprecedented nature of the claims. The situation highlighted the importance of clear, comprehensive insurance coverage and prompted a reevaluation of risk management and insurance practices in the business world.

The legal journey through the aftermath of 9/11 was not merely a matter of financial settlements; it was intricately tied to the broader narrative of recovery and rebuilding. Each claim filed represented a story of disruption and a quest for recovery, underscoring the human aspect behind the staggering financial figures. The resolution of these claims involved not only legal acumen but also a sensitivity to the broader social and economic consequences of the attacks.

Moreover, the 9/11 property damage and business interruption claims underscored the global interconnectedness of modern economies. The events in New York sent shockwaves through national and international markets, affecting insurance and legal norms worldwide. The aftermath prompted a global reassessment of how businesses and legal systems prepare for and respond to unforeseen catastrophes.

2. Life Insurance Claims

The aftermath of the September 11, 2001, attacks brought an outpouring of life insurance claims, a stark testament to the human toll of the tragedy. With over $1 billion in payouts, these claims represented more than just financial transactions; they symbolized the profound personal losses of nearly 3,000 individuals who perished. Behind each claim was a family faced with the unimaginable task of moving forward in the absence of their loved ones.

The processing of these life insurance claims was not just an administrative endeavor; it was an emotionally charged process, deeply intertwined with the grief and trauma of the event. Insurance companies were thrust into the role of not only financial providers but also as entities that had to handle each claim with a high degree of sensitivity and compassion. They were dealing with bereaved families who were navigating through their most vulnerable moments, making the task at hand not just about financial restitution but also about offering support and understanding during a time of collective mourning.

The magnitude of the life insurance claims highlighted the stark reality of the tragedy, putting into perspective the scale of loss and the number of lives irrevocably changed. Each claim filed was a narrative of loss, a reflection of the void left by those who died. These narratives underscored the role of life insurance not just as a financial safety net, but as a critical component in providing a semblance of security and assistance in the aftermath of loss.

Handling these claims required insurance companies to balance efficiency with empathy. The sheer volume of claims necessitated streamlined processes to ensure timely payouts, yet each case demanded individual attention to address the specific needs and circumstances of the bereaved families. This delicate balancing act was crucial in maintaining the trust and confidence of the public, demonstrating the insurance industry's capacity to respond to an unprecedented crisis with both professionalism and humanity.

Moreover, the life insurance claims following 9/11 served as a somber reminder of the importance of life insurance in providing financial stability and peace of mind in times of unforeseen tragedies. They highlighted the essential role of insurance in the broader social and economic fabric, offering a lifeline to those grappling with sudden loss.

3. Health and Disability Claims

The health and disability claims stemming from the 9/11 attacks represent a critical and ongoing chapter in the narrative of the tragedy's aftermath. The establishment of the Victim Compensation Fund (VCF) was a governmental response aimed at addressing the profound health impacts faced by individuals exposed to the hazardous aftermath of the attacks. With payouts exceeding $7 billion, the VCF underscores the magnitude of the health crisis that unfolded following that fateful day in September 2001.

These claims are not just numbers on a balance sheet; they embody the enduring physical and emotional toll on first responders and recovery workers who bravely faced the perilous conditions at Ground Zero. Many of these individuals have suffered from severe health conditions, including various forms of cancer and respiratory diseases, directly attributable to their exposure to toxic dust and debris. The VCF?s role in providing financial assistance to these claimants is a testament to the ongoing efforts to rectify, in some measure, the profound injustices inflicted by the attacks.

The processing of these health and disability claims through the VCF is more than an administrative task; it represents a continued commitment to recognizing and compensating the sacrifices made by those who responded to the crisis. The fund's substantial payouts reflect the recognition of the long-term health consequences faced by the heroes of that day and the broader community affected by the toxic exposures. This financial support is vital, aiding in covering medical treatments, lost wages, and other expenses incurred due to health complications arising from the attacks.

However, the sheer scale of these claims also highlights the challenges and complexities involved in quantifying and addressing health-related repercussions of such a catastrophic event. The VCF has had to navigate the intricate task of validating claims and determining appropriate compensation levels, balancing between the need for thorough assessment and the urgency of providing timely aid to sufferers.

The health and disability claims related to 9/11, managed through the VCF, serve as a poignant reminder of the long shadow cast by the attacks, not only on the physical landscape of New York City but also on the health and well-being of thousands of individuals. These claims are a critical part of the broader narrative of recovery and remembrance, ensuring that the legacy of those affected continues to receive the attention and support it warrants.

4. Liability Claims and Litigation

The liability claims and litigation arising from the 9/11 attacks opened a complex legal chapter, addressing questions of accountability and negligence. These proceedings involved a broad range of defendants, including airlines, security companies, and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, highlighting the multifaceted nature of responsibility for the tragedy. The legal landscape was marked by significant settlements, including one notable case where airlines and other defendants agreed to a settlement of approximately $1.2 billion. This substantial sum reflects the gravity of the claims and the acknowledgment of potential lapses in security and oversight leading up to the attacks.

The litigation process sought to unravel the intricacies of legal responsibility, delving into the operational and security protocols in place before the attacks. Plaintiffs argued that the devastating impact of the events could have been mitigated with stricter security measures and more rigorous oversight. The settlement of $1.2 billion, while substantial, was part of a broader legal effort to seek redress for the alleged negligence that contributed to the scale of the disaster.

The liability claims served as a critical vehicle for examining the preparedness and response of key entities in the face of terrorist threats. The legal actions taken against airlines, security firms, and the Port Authority were not merely about securing financial compensation; they were also about holding these entities accountable and prompting a reevaluation of security and safety protocols. The litigation process underscored the need for stringent measures to prevent such tragedies in the future.

5. Government Compensation Programs

The September 11th Victim Compensation Fund (VCF) stands as a pivotal element of the U.S. government's response to the 9/11 attacks, embodying the effort to provide financial relief and support to those most directly affected by the tragedy. Initially operational from 2001 to 2004, the VCF distributed over $7 billion in compensation, offering a measure of solace to the families of the victims and to those who sustained injuries in the attacks and their immediate aftermath.

The establishment of the VCF was a recognition of the profound personal and economic losses inflicted by the attacks, and the fund was tasked with the challenging role of quantifying and compensating for those losses. It sought to provide a streamlined and compassionate process for claimants, attempting to mitigate the financial burdens and facilitate a semblance of recovery for individuals grappling with the catastrophic impacts of that day.

Beyond its initial phase, the VCF's reauthorization to address ongoing health-related claims underscores the enduring nature of the 9/11 tragedy?s impact. The continued operation of the VCF acknowledges that the repercussions of the attacks extended far beyond the immediate aftermath, with many individuals developing health issues years later, primarily due to exposure to hazardous conditions and toxic substances at Ground Zero. This extended mandate of the VCF reflects a commitment to long-term support for affected individuals, recognizing that the health consequences for many have been a persistent struggle requiring ongoing assistance.

The reauthorized VCF represents a sustained governmental pledge to honor the losses and sacrifices associated with 9/11. It acknowledges that the effects of such a monumental event do not simply fade with time but persist in the lives and health of those who were on the front lines and in the surrounding communities. By compensating for both immediate and long-term impacts, the VCF serves as a tangible expression of national solidarity and a recognition of the continued suffering of many who were affected by the events of that day.

6. Mental Health Claims

The mental health claims arising from the 9/11 attacks represent a significant and poignant aspect of the tragedy's extensive aftermath. Although quantifying the total financial impact of these claims is challenging, they underscore the deep psychological scars left by the events of that day. These claims highlight the need for psychological counseling and treatment for those affected, pointing to the widespread mental health toll that the attacks inflicted.

In the wake of 9/11, insurance companies and employers encountered a surge in claims for mental health services. These claims were not limited to the immediate survivors of the attacks or the families of the victims but also extended to first responders, employees, and residents of the affected areas. The claims encompassed a range of psychological issues, from acute stress and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to depression and anxiety, reflecting the profound and varied psychological impacts of the tragedy.

The influx of mental health claims post-9/11 pushed insurance companies and mental health professionals to address the significant demand for psychological support. It revealed the necessity of having robust mental health coverage in insurance policies and the need for accessible and effective mental health services. Employers and health providers had to adapt to the increased need for psychological care, facilitating access to counseling and therapy for those grappling with the aftermath of the attacks.

The mental health claims related to 9/11 also highlighted the broader societal recognition of the importance of mental health and the need for comprehensive support systems. They brought to the forefront the conversation about mental health in the context of national tragedies, emphasizing that the impacts of such events are not only physical or financial but deeply psychological.





Comments about this post


Frank Miller ()

The narrative of 9/11 is still so potent, and these lawyers play a big part in how it's written from here on out. Their work isn't just legal-it's about helping to stitch the fabric of our community back together. Each case should be handled with the utmost care and respect, recognizing the weight it carries for everyone involved. It's about more than just settlements; it's about setting precedents for compassion and resilience.

Anna Schmidt ()

Working here, you hear all sorts of stories about 9/11, and now about the lawyers dealing with the aftermath. It seems like such a monumental task. These attorneys need to be both skilled in law and compassionate in handling their clients' emotional and physical wounds. It's a blend of professionalism and humanity. The best outcome would be one where the victims feel supported and validated in their ongoing journey of recovery.

Gary Thompson ()

Lawyers handling these 9/11 cases? They've got a tough beat, like us cops. They need to serve and protect, but in a courtroom. It's essential they remember why they're doing this-it's for justice, for making things right for those who suffered. They should handle each case with honor, knowing they're helping to mend parts of our city's heart torn apart that day.

Raj Patel ()

In tech, we value innovation and solutions, which is something these lawyers dealing with 9/11 claims need to bring to the table. They must innovate within the legal framework to ensure that justice is swift and fair. It's not just about legal fees; it's about creating pathways to healing through justice. The community relies on them to cut through the complexities and bring about resolutions that genuinely aid recovery.

Tina Russo ()

As someone who reports on the ongoing impacts of 9/11, the role of these specialized law firms is pivotal. They navigate the murky waters of insurance claims and legal red tape. The best ones work tirelessly, knowing the historical significance of their work, while others might see dollar signs in a tragedy's wake. Transparency and integrity are key in their operations. It's their duty to uphold the highest standards of legal practice while being sensitive to the emotional scars left by the attacks.

Mike O'Connor ()

These lawyers, they've got a job to do, just like any of us. But their job's got a lot riding on it-they're dealing with folks who've lost a lot, who are still hurting from those attacks. They've gotta be tough but fair, fight hard but keep their integrity. It's their chance to really make a difference, to show that even in the face of such disaster, there's hope and help.

Linda Green ()

From my point of view, having seen firsthand the fallout of that day, the emotional and physical toll it took on so many, these attorneys have a critical role. They need to advocate fiercely but also compassionately. There's a lot of responsibility on their shoulders to handle these cases with the dignity and respect they deserve. It's not just about legal victories; it's about healing and closure.

Sammy Lee ()

Look, it's a tough world, and those 9/11 attacks left a lot of people in bad places. So these lawyers, they step in to deal with the big insurance companies. Sometimes, I think they're the only ones who can speak that complicated legal language. But they gotta remember, it's about helping people rebuild lives, not just building their careers. Hopefully, they do it with some heart, not just for the billable hours.

Maria Lopez ()

It's a complicated situation, really. These law firms specialize in personal injury claims from such a catastrophic event-while their expertise is undoubtedly valuable, one must question the ethics. Are they exploiting tragedy for profit, or genuinely aiding those in need? The balance is delicate, and I hope their moral compass guides them to serve justice and provide real support to the families still grieving, not just a hefty paycheck for themselves.

John Dough ()

I reckon the aftermath of 9/11 was tough on everyone in New York, and now you've got these lawyers handling insurance claims. It's good that someone's fighting for the victims, but at the back of your mind, you wonder if it's all about the money for them. Ideally, they'd put the needs of those hurt first, make sure they're compensated fairly without dragging them through more pain with endless legal battles. That would truly honor the spirit of what New York stood for that day.

[1189]